Special Legal Orders
Normative Diversity in the 19th and 20th Centuries

Research Field

The company as a special order: Factory of Zeitzer Eisengießerei und Maschinenbau AG (1919)

The legal history of the 19th and 20th centuries is characterised by a remarkable ambivalence. On the one hand, it was the time of large-scale codifications, mostly based on the principle of the equality of the users of law, which regulated broad areas of life in a consistent manner. This law aimed at universality represented – at least to both practitioners and scholars of law – the legal system. On the other hand, already existing or newly developing social differences and the functional differentiation of modern society required an increasing number of new regulations regarding specific groups or domains. Further differentiation was the result of the state's expanding its claim to regulate in other areas, too, above all in the sphere of social and economic policy. New regulatory needs also arose from scientific and technological progress. The latter led both to the differentiation and specialization of state law itself and to the creation of autonomous or semi-autonomous special legal orders.

Numerous fundamental questions of modern legal history are connected to these opposing movements towards universality, on the one hand, and increasing differentiation, on the other. How did state law seek to accommodate these developments? What non-state legal systems emerged? What role did particular religious, cultural, technological, socio-political and economic rationalities come to play in legal or regulatory systems? What special judicial orders developed? Did new concepts of law and normativity emerge? The Research Field brings together projects that explore these questions by examining specific sectors or groups, or that focus on contemporary jurisprudential reflection on these special orders.

Projects of former MPI researcher

Recent Publications

1.
Collin, P.: Mulitinormativität [Multinormativität] und administrative Logik – neue verwaltungshistorische Perspektiven. Administory 5 (2020) (1), pp. 6 - 19 (2021)
2.
Wolckenhaar, L.: Die knarrende Stimme des Korporatismus [Rezension von: Jonas Hagedorn, Oswald von Nell-Breuning SJ. Aufbrüche der katholischen Soziallehre in der Weimarer Republik, Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh 2018]. Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History Rg 28, pp. 353 - 355 (2020)
3.
Collin, P.: Selbstregulierung des Wettbewerbs. Konkurrenz und Kooperation von Sparkassen, Banken und Kreditgenossenschaften im frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History Rg 28, pp. 215 - 230 (2020)
4.
Wolf, J.: Der Bremer Vulkan in der Krise: Der Strukturwandel einer westdeutschen Werft in den 1970er und 1980er Jahren. In: Transformation als soziale Praxis: Mitteleuropa seit den 1970er Jahren, pp. 39 - 51 (Eds. Hoffmann, D.; Brunnbauer, U.). Metropol, Berlin (2020)
Go to Editor View